Search for: "Magna, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
From In the Matter of Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:17 pm by Patent Docs
The Commission instituted this investigation on January 28, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Magna Electronics Inc. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 4:08 pm
There's been allot of discussion about the Framework for Fairness Agreement between the Canadian Auto Workers and Magna International Inc., a major automotive parts supplier and Canada's largest automotive employer. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:09 am by Michael C. Smith
Magna International Inc. et al, 6:08cv0455 (3/26/10)Judge: John LoveHolding: Motion to Transfer Venue GRANTEDHere the plaintiff was from Michigan, as were two of the four defendants, with the other two from nearby parts of Canada, and pending litigation between the plaintiff and two of the defendants was pending in Michigan as well. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:29 am
Hein and Co., Inc., and Raytheon Company through the Friends of the Law Library. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:40 am
Hein and Co., Inc., and Raytheon Company through the Friends of the Law Library. [read post]
16 May 2010, 12:56 am
  The Maryland General Assembly swung into action passing legislation giving the state condemnation authority over all of Magna's Maryland assets, including the Preakness, which, when coupled with Maryland's existing right of first refusal over any transfer of Pimlico gave the state all the hammer it needed to secure an agreement with Pimlico's owner ensuring the Preakness Stakes will remain in Maryland forever.Pimlico is about to get new owners in MI Developments (a… [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
In In the Matter of Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc., v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday, the New York Court of Appeals-- the state's highest court-- heard oral arguments in Matter of Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc. v McCoy. [read post]